CE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Green Plains has a net margin of -0.88% compared to Celanese's net margin of -12.12%. Celanese's return on equity of -24.41% beat Green Plains's return on equity of -11.81%.

Celanese has a consensus price target of $58.95, signalling upside risk potential of 10.06%. On the other hand Green Plains has an analysts' consensus of $8.63 which suggests that it could grow by 94.7%. Given that Green Plains has higher upside potential than Celanese, analysts believe Green Plains is more attractive than Celanese.

Celanese has a beta of 1.095, which suggesting that the stock is 9.479% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Green Plains has a beta of 1.187, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.693%.

Celanese has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.73%. Green Plains offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celanese pays -20.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Green Plains pays out -6.26% of its earnings as a dividend.

Celanese quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Green Plains quarterly revenues of $601.5M. Celanese's net income of -$21M is higher than Green Plains's net income of -$72.9M. Notably, Celanese's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.03x while Green Plains's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celanese is 0.58x versus 0.12x for Green Plains. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hawkins has a net margin of -0.88% compared to Celanese's net margin of 6.66%. Celanese's return on equity of -24.41% beat Hawkins's return on equity of 19.28%.

Celanese has a consensus price target of $58.95, signalling upside risk potential of 10.06%. On the other hand Hawkins has an analysts' consensus of $148.33 which suggests that it could grow by 17.1%. Given that Hawkins has higher upside potential than Celanese, analysts believe Hawkins is more attractive than Celanese.

Celanese has a beta of 1.095, which suggesting that the stock is 9.479% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hawkins has a beta of 0.866, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.438%.

Celanese has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.73%. Hawkins offers a yield of 0.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Celanese pays -20.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Hawkins pays out 17.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Hawkins's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Celanese quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Hawkins quarterly revenues of $245.3M. Celanese's net income of -$21M is lower than Hawkins's net income of $16.3M. Notably, Celanese's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.03x while Hawkins's PE ratio is 31.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celanese is 0.58x versus 2.72x for Hawkins. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

International Flavors & Fragrances has a net margin of -0.88% compared to Celanese's net margin of -35.81%. Celanese's return on equity of -24.41% beat International Flavors & Fragrances's return on equity of -5.92%.

Celanese has a consensus price target of $58.95, signalling upside risk potential of 10.06%. On the other hand International Flavors & Fragrances has an analysts' consensus of $91.61 which suggests that it could grow by 20.98%. Given that International Flavors & Fragrances has higher upside potential than Celanese, analysts believe International Flavors & Fragrances is more attractive than Celanese.

Celanese has a beta of 1.095, which suggesting that the stock is 9.479% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison International Flavors & Fragrances has a beta of 1.078, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.836%.

Celanese has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.73%. International Flavors & Fragrances offers a yield of 2.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Celanese pays -20.17% of its earnings as a dividend. International Flavors & Fragrances pays out 211.52% of its earnings as a dividend.

Celanese quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than International Flavors & Fragrances quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Celanese's net income of -$21M is higher than International Flavors & Fragrances's net income of -$1B. Notably, Celanese's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.03x while International Flavors & Fragrances's PE ratio is 84.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celanese is 0.58x versus 1.70x for International Flavors & Fragrances. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kronos Worldwide has a net margin of -0.88% compared to Celanese's net margin of 3.7%. Celanese's return on equity of -24.41% beat Kronos Worldwide's return on equity of 11.85%.

Celanese has a consensus price target of $58.95, signalling upside risk potential of 10.06%. On the other hand Kronos Worldwide has an analysts' consensus of $9.17 which suggests that it could grow by 37.02%. Given that Kronos Worldwide has higher upside potential than Celanese, analysts believe Kronos Worldwide is more attractive than Celanese.

Celanese has a beta of 1.095, which suggesting that the stock is 9.479% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kronos Worldwide has a beta of 1.226, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.579%.

Celanese has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.73%. Kronos Worldwide offers a yield of 5.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Celanese pays -20.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Kronos Worldwide pays out 64.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Kronos Worldwide's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Celanese quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Kronos Worldwide quarterly revenues of $489.8M. Celanese's net income of -$21M is lower than Kronos Worldwide's net income of $18.1M. Notably, Celanese's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.03x while Kronos Worldwide's PE ratio is 8.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celanese is 0.58x versus 0.41x for Kronos Worldwide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.