CE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

FMC has a net margin of -80.76% compared to Celanese's net margin of -1.96%. Celanese's return on equity of -21.13% beat FMC's return on equity of 7.31%.

Celanese has a consensus price target of $58.26, signalling upside risk potential of 30.12%. On the other hand FMC has an analysts' consensus of $47.69 which suggests that it could grow by 32.8%. Given that FMC has higher upside potential than Celanese, analysts believe FMC is more attractive than Celanese.

Celanese has a beta of 1.095, which suggesting that the stock is 9.479% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FMC has a beta of 0.800, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.017%.

Celanese has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.26%. FMC offers a yield of 6.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. Celanese pays -20.17% of its earnings as a dividend. FMC pays out 85.2% of its earnings as a dividend. FMC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Celanese quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than FMC quarterly revenues of $791.4M. Celanese's net income of -$1.9B is lower than FMC's net income of -$15.5M. Notably, Celanese's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.03x while FMC's PE ratio is 13.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celanese is 0.48x versus 1.09x for FMC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Green Plains has a net margin of -80.76% compared to Celanese's net margin of -9.41%. Celanese's return on equity of -21.13% beat Green Plains's return on equity of -9%.

Celanese has a consensus price target of $58.26, signalling upside risk potential of 30.12%. On the other hand Green Plains has an analysts' consensus of $10.44 which suggests that it could grow by 182.1%. Given that Green Plains has higher upside potential than Celanese, analysts believe Green Plains is more attractive than Celanese.

Celanese has a beta of 1.095, which suggesting that the stock is 9.479% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Green Plains has a beta of 1.187, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.693%.

Celanese has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.26%. Green Plains offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celanese pays -20.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Green Plains pays out -6.26% of its earnings as a dividend.

Celanese quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Green Plains quarterly revenues of $584M. Celanese's net income of -$1.9B is lower than Green Plains's net income of -$54.9M. Notably, Celanese's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.03x while Green Plains's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celanese is 0.48x versus 0.10x for Green Plains. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

International Flavors & Fragrances has a net margin of -80.76% compared to Celanese's net margin of -1.66%. Celanese's return on equity of -21.13% beat International Flavors & Fragrances's return on equity of 1.69%.

Celanese has a consensus price target of $58.26, signalling upside risk potential of 30.12%. On the other hand International Flavors & Fragrances has an analysts' consensus of $93.11 which suggests that it could grow by 17.63%. Given that Celanese has higher upside potential than International Flavors & Fragrances, analysts believe Celanese is more attractive than International Flavors & Fragrances.

Celanese has a beta of 1.095, which suggesting that the stock is 9.479% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison International Flavors & Fragrances has a beta of 1.078, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.836%.

Celanese has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.26%. International Flavors & Fragrances offers a yield of 2.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Celanese pays -20.17% of its earnings as a dividend. International Flavors & Fragrances pays out 211.52% of its earnings as a dividend.

Celanese quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than International Flavors & Fragrances quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Celanese's net income of -$1.9B is lower than International Flavors & Fragrances's net income of -$46M. Notably, Celanese's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.03x while International Flavors & Fragrances's PE ratio is 84.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celanese is 0.48x versus 1.77x for International Flavors & Fragrances. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kronos Worldwide has a net margin of -80.76% compared to Celanese's net margin of -3.12%. Celanese's return on equity of -21.13% beat Kronos Worldwide's return on equity of 10.72%.

Celanese has a consensus price target of $58.26, signalling upside risk potential of 30.12%. On the other hand Kronos Worldwide has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 35.14%. Given that Kronos Worldwide has higher upside potential than Celanese, analysts believe Kronos Worldwide is more attractive than Celanese.

Celanese has a beta of 1.095, which suggesting that the stock is 9.479% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kronos Worldwide has a beta of 1.226, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.579%.

Celanese has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.26%. Kronos Worldwide offers a yield of 4.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Celanese pays -20.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Kronos Worldwide pays out 64.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Kronos Worldwide's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Celanese quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Kronos Worldwide quarterly revenues of $423.1M. Celanese's net income of -$1.9B is lower than Kronos Worldwide's net income of -$13.2M. Notably, Celanese's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.03x while Kronos Worldwide's PE ratio is 10.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celanese is 0.48x versus 0.45x for Kronos Worldwide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.